Command Query Responsibility Segregation (CQRS) in Software Architecture

Vijayasankar Balasubramanian
4 min readFeb 9, 2025

Introduction

Command Query Responsibility Segregation (CQRS) is an architectural pattern that separates the read and write operations of a system into distinct models. This separation enhances scalability, performance, and maintainability, making it a popular choice for modern distributed applications, particularly those that require high data consistency and availability.

This essay will explore the core concepts of CQRS, its benefits, trade-offs, and practical implementation using Java. We will provide code samples to demonstrate how to structure a CQRS-based system effectively.

1. Understanding CQRS

CQRS is an architectural pattern that divides the system into two distinct parts:
- Command Model (Write Side): Handles state-changing operations (Create, Update, Delete).
- Query Model (Read Side): Handles read operations without modifying the state.

1.1 Why Use CQRS?
Traditional CRUD-based applications often struggle with performance, scalability, and consistency issues as they scale. By implementing CQRS, we can:
- Optimize performance by using separate models tuned for reading and writing.
- Improve scalability by independently scaling read and write workloads.
- Enhance security by restricting write operations to a limited set of users or services.
- Allow for better event-driven designs by integrating Event Sourcing.

2. CQRS Architecture and Flow

A typical CQRS-based system consists of:
1. Commands: Requests that change the application state.
2. Command Handlers: Process commands and modify the write model.
3. Event Store (Optional — When using Event Sourcing): Stores historical state changes.
4. Queries: Requests that fetch data from the read model.
5. Query Handlers: Retrieve data from optimized databases.

The communication between these components is often facilitated by message queues, event buses, or service layers.

3. Implementing CQRS in Java

We will implement a simple User Management System using CQRS principles with Spring Boot.

3.1 Project Dependencies
To implement CQRS with **Spring Boot**, we need the following dependencies in `pom.xml`:

<dependencies>
<!-- Spring Boot Starter Web -->
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-web</artifactId>
</dependency>

<!-- Spring Boot Starter Data JPA -->
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-data-jpa</artifactId>
</dependency>

<!-- H2 Database (For simplicity) -->
<dependency>
<groupId>com.h2database</groupId>
<artifactId>h2</artifactId>
<scope>runtime</scope>
</dependency>

<!-- Lombok (For reducing boilerplate code) -->
<dependency>
<groupId>org.projectlombok</groupId>
<artifactId>lombok</artifactId>
<scope>provided</scope>
</dependency>
</dependencies>

3.2 Defining the User Entity
The `User` entity will be used to store user data in the write model.

import jakarta.persistence.*;
import lombok.*;

@Entity
@Getter
@Setter
@NoArgsConstructor
@AllArgsConstructor
public class User {
@Id
@GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY)
private Long id;
private String name;
private String email;
}

3.3 Implementing the Command Side
Commands represent actions that change the system state.

3.3.1 Command Object

import lombok.*;

@Getter
@AllArgsConstructor
public class CreateUserCommand {
private String name;
private String email;
}

3.3.2 Command Handler

import org.springframework.stereotype.Service;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired;

@Service
public class UserCommandHandler {
private final UserRepository userRepository;

@Autowired
public UserCommandHandler(UserRepository userRepository) {
this.userRepository = userRepository;
}

public User handle(CreateUserCommand command) {
User user = new User();
user.setName(command.getName());
user.setEmail(command.getEmail());
return userRepository.save(user);
}
}

3.3.3 Command Controller

import org.springframework.web.bind.annotation.*;

@RestController
@RequestMapping("/users")
public class UserCommandController {
private final UserCommandHandler commandHandler;

public UserCommandController(UserCommandHandler commandHandler) {
this.commandHandler = commandHandler;
}

@PostMapping
public User createUser(@RequestBody CreateUserCommand command) {
return commandHandler.handle(command);
}
}

3.4 Implementing the Query Side
Unlike the command side, queries do not modify data.

3.4.1 Query Object

@Getter
@AllArgsConstructor
public class GetUserQuery {
private Long id;
}

3.4.2 Query Handler

import org.springframework.stereotype.Service;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired;
import java.util.Optional;
@Service
public class UserQueryHandler {
private final UserRepository userRepository;
@Autowired
public UserQueryHandler(UserRepository userRepository) {
this.userRepository = userRepository;
}
public Optional<User> handle(GetUserQuery query) {
return userRepository.findById(query.getId());
}
}

3.4.3 Query Controller

import org.springframework.web.bind.annotation.*;
import java.util.Optional;
@RestController
@RequestMapping("/users")
public class UserQueryController {
private final UserQueryHandler queryHandler;
public UserQueryController(UserQueryHandler queryHandler) {
this.queryHandler = queryHandler;
}
@GetMapping("/{id}")
public Optional<User> getUser(@PathVariable Long id) {
return queryHandler.handle(new GetUserQuery(id));
}
}

4. Benefits and Trade-Offs of CQRS

4.1 Benefits
- Performance Optimization: Read and write operations can be optimized independently.
- Scalability: Read and write workloads can be scaled separately.
- Security: Write operations can be restricted to certain roles.
- Flexibility: Different storage mechanisms can be used for queries and commands.

4.2 Trade-Offs
- Increased Complexity: More components mean a steeper learning curve.
- Data Synchronization Challenges: If separate databases are used, ensuring consistency requires additional mechanisms.
- Higher Maintenance Costs: More code to manage compared to monolithic CRUD systems.

5. When to Use CQRS
CQRS is most beneficial in:
- High-traffic applications requiring independent read/write scaling.
- Event-driven systems where audit logs and state tracking are critical.
- Microservices architectures where services have distinct responsibilities.

CQRS may not be necessary for simple CRUD applications, as the added complexity may outweigh the benefits.

Conclusion

CQRS is a powerful architectural pattern that enhances system scalability, maintainability, and performance by separating read and write operations. While it introduces additional complexity, its benefits are significant for large-scale distributed applications.

By implementing CQRS with Java and Spring Boot, we demonstrated how to decouple commands from queries, leading to a more modular and efficient system. However, careful evaluation of system needs is crucial before adopting CQRS, ensuring that its advantages align with project requirements.

Sign up to discover human stories that deepen your understanding of the world.

Free

Distraction-free reading. No ads.

Organize your knowledge with lists and highlights.

Tell your story. Find your audience.

Membership

Read member-only stories

Support writers you read most

Earn money for your writing

Listen to audio narrations

Read offline with the Medium app

Vijayasankar Balasubramanian
Vijayasankar Balasubramanian

Written by Vijayasankar Balasubramanian

Java Solution Architect, Java Full Stack Engineer

No responses yet

Write a response